sarahhh34 sarahhh34
  • 21-11-2017
  • History
contestada

What methods of constitutional interpretation do justices commonly use to decide cases?

Respuesta :

peterdaly
peterdaly peterdaly
  • 29-11-2017
I would say that judges would most likely use precedent in cases of constitutional interpretation for support in coming up with a verdict and thus arrive at a verdict that was in accordance with an already accepted practice historically.
Answer Link

Otras preguntas

_____ percent of adults over the age of 65 volunteer. 74 33 50 23
Please Help! answer question in pic.
Which excerpt from Betty Friedan’s The Feminine Mystique contains underlined keywords that reflect mainstream society’s view of a woman’s role in the 1950s and
A basketball rolls off a deck that is 3.2 m from the pavement. The basketball lands 0.75 m from the edge of the deck. How fast was the basketball rolling? Seem
​if, when a firm doubles all its​ inputs, its average cost of production​ increases, then production displays a. economies of scale. b. diminishing returns. c.
Today, a popular motto of the zoroastrian religion is
"120. what process or enzyme was used for step 1?"
If jakob grimm, who developed what has come to be known as grimm's law, were analyzing the historical relationships among the so-called dialects of chinese (suc
What is the value of x in the equation 1/3x-2/3=-18?
ead the excerpt from a short story. After two hours of a tedious cinematic production, the dim aisle lights flickered back on. Having endured scenes of fake gor