When chance, bias, and confounding have been ruled out as alternative explanations for an association, we may conclude that the association is causal?

Question

25-07-2018
Social Studies

contestada

When chance, bias, and confounding have been ruled out as alternative explanations for an association, we may conclude that the association is causal?

Respuesta :

Otras preguntas

Read the two excerpts from act 2, scene 1, of The Tragedy of Julius Caesar.Excerpt 1:[BRUTUS.] Since Cassius first did whet me against CaesarI have not slept.Be

what is similarities and differences of print and non-print materials?

Hey, can someone please help me with this real quick

A 16.0 L sample contains 0.80 moles of a gas. If the gas is at the same pressure and temperature, what is the number of moles when the volume increases to 24.0

find mHK please help

follow the picture .

Read the following passage from "Cranes." The northern village at the border of the Thirty-eighth Parallel was snugly settled under the high, bright autumn sky.

A bag contains five red marbles and three green marbles. What is the probability of selecting one green marble from the bag? (Hint: the answer is a fraction...)

NO SCAM. PLEASE SHOW WORK. WILL GIVE BRAINLY TO CORRECT ANSWER.

DukeMoseti DukeMoseti · Answer 1 · 2018-08-03T10:37:55+02:00

DukeMoseti DukeMoseti

03-08-2018

True. By ruling out chance, bias and confounding, you can be able to determine that the association that is observed in the study is valid. These is because these are the main alternative explanations that can rule out that the association is causal

Answer Link